I thought that I would send you one more newsletter to let you know that yesterday the Board of Trustees approved the Proposal for Academic Renewal, with one small amendment. In the version that the Academic Senate submitted to the Board, the new Benjamin T. Rome School of Music, Drama, and Art was to be established on August 20, 2018. Since we have already hired the new dean, the Board was comfortable establishing the new school effective immediately. I look forward to working with Dean Jacqueline Leary-Warsaw and our students, faculty, and staff in Music, Drama, and Art in the launch of this exciting new school.
You’ll recall that one objective of the Proposal was to reduce our operating budget by $3.5 million through a reduction of 35 faculty positions. I am very pleased to inform you that, as of yesterday morning, our hopes to achieve this through voluntary means alone have been realized. The details regarding a couple of departures are still being finalized, but I think I can say with confidence that this part of Academic Renewal is now complete, and has been accomplished without any program closures or faculty layoffs.
Now that the Proposal has secured the Board’s approval, we can focus our efforts on implementing its many forward-looking initiatives, including the creation of the new Center for Teaching Excellence, the establishment of our Endowment for the Humanities, and renovations of our labs, classrooms, and performance and studio spaces.
I would like to take this moment to reflect on the Academic Renewal process as it unfolded over the past nine months. I acknowledge that this past semester in particular hasn’t been an easy one. We have had some very difficult conversations. I’m sure that many of you can think of things that could have been done better. Still, I hope that we can all agree that the version of the Proposal approved by the Board was superior to the version I presented to the Academic Senate in March, and that our collaboration has paid off. The numerous improvements to the original draft are the result of the tremendous efforts of a great many people. They also testify to a broad and deep commitment to the good of the University. I am grateful to every person who worked to make the Proposal better.
Given the significance of the issues involved, the intensity of the dialog that ensued was not only predictable, it was entirely appropriate. I also expect that some of you still have concerns and questions, all of which will surely take time to work out. I look forward to engaging in continued dialog to this end, and would be happy to meet this summer with any faculty member or members, and respond to your emails to firstname.lastname@example.org. In addition, we will be adding a Questions/Suggestions web page to the Provost Office website that provides an opportunity for faculty to submit comments, questions, suggestions, and concerns anonymously, should you prefer that. I will review each item posted, and endeavor to offer a response either on the Provost Office website or through other appropriate means.
We should not let the challenges of this past semester hide the many and important successes we continue to have. After the undergraduate freshman shortfall two years ago, our enrollment bounced back in the following year, and this Fall’s class will represent a further increase. Our new graduate enrollments to date have increased significantly compared to last year, turning around a four-year decline. Our student retention is the highest it’s been since we first started tracking such statistics in the early 1990’s. This past year we approved the first major change to our Core Curriculum in decades, affirming our commitment to a broad-based liberal arts education. We are embarking on an exciting exploration—funded entirely by philanthropy—into how to bring a Catholic University education to low-income Hispanic families in the Southwest through a hybrid online-local combination, to be piloted in Tucson, AZ. Our fundraising has quadrupled since 2010, with each of the past three years setting all-time fundraising records for us. Given the success of our Academic Renewal effort, instead of diverting every new dollar generated from all these achievements towards closing a budget gap—and spending all summer looking for additional cuts—we can now focus all our efforts on investing in our future.
I will close by expressing my admiration for and gratitude to the many faculty, students, and staff who engaged so vigorously and intelligently in these important discussions. It is my privilege to work with you all. I wish you a well-earned, restful summer.
(The following message from Provost Andrew V. Abela was included in the the May 15, 2018 Faculty Newsletter.)
You will have read in President Garvey’s email of May 9 that the Academic Senate approved the Proposal for Academic Renewal, by a vote of 35 to 8. Since there were a number of changes made during that Senate meeting, I thought that I would take this occasion to share the highlights of the Proposal, as approved by the Senate.
You can see the full text of the Proposal, as approved by the Senate, on the Academic Senate Archive, which is located in the Team Drive. The next and final stage is for the Proposal to be considered by the Board of Trustees at their June meeting.
(The following message from Provost Andrew V. Abela was included in the the April 16, 2018 Faculty Newsletter.)
In the March 9 issue of the Faculty Newsletter I wrote about the Academic Renewal project. I explained that the Academic Senate would commence deliberations on the Proposal for Academic Renewal at its March 15 meeting. Last Thursday, April 12, the Senate held its second round of deliberations.
In advance of the April 12 session, three committees of the Academic Senate — the Academic Policy Committee (APC), Budget and Planning Committee (BPC), and the Committee on Faculty Economic Welfare (CoFEW) — analyzed the proposal and submitted reports that contained a number of proposed amendments. Likewise the organizations that represent our students — the Student Government Association (SGA) and the Graduate Student Association (GSA) — presented amendments.
As the mover of the proposal, I had to determine whether I considered an amendment as “friendly” to the overall goals of the proposal, or as “unfriendly.” I tried to accept as many as I could in an effort to build as wide a consensus as possible for the Academic Renewal project. In that spirit I accepted the SGA amendments, both of which involve leaving the Department of Media and Communication Studies in the School of Arts and Sciences. I accepted all of the GSA’s amendments, which focus on mentorship initiatives and other support for graduate students. I also approved the change for the name of the proposed new school, which would be called the Benjamin T. Rome School of Music, Drama and Art, or Rome School of Music, Drama and Art.
There was insufficient time at the April 12 session to review all the proposed amendments. The Senate will convene an extraordinary session this week for that purpose. Nevertheless, at last week’s meeting, the Senate adopted a resolution to refer the Proposal on Academic Renewal, with amendments, to the Senate Ad Hoc Committee elected in February. The Ad Hoc Committee’s charge is to consult widely with students, faculty, and staff who will be affected by Academic Renewal and to submit a report to the Senate by May 2, in time for final action on the proposal at its May 9 meeting.
In order to enable you to see all the relevant documents related to Academic Renewal, we will be sharing the Academic Senate Archive files with all faculty. You will receive an email invitation to view the folder and access the file through your University email’s Google Drive. In the folder you will find the Proposal for Academic Renewal; the APC, BPC, and CoFEW reports; the student government amendments; my written response to all the recommendations that I shared with the senators; and other documents.
I want to express my gratitude to everyone who has dedicated much time and effort on the Proposal for Academic Renewal. I want to encourage you to attend the town halls meetings that the Senate Ad Hoc Committee on Academic Renewal will convene to solicit your feedback.
I look forward to seeing you all at University Research Day on April 19.
Andrew V. Abela, Ph.D.
(The following message from Provost Andrew V. Abela was included in the the March 9, 2018 Faculty Newsletter.)
I trust that you have all had a restful Spring Break.
This month’s newsletter focuses on the Academic Renewal project. Back in September, I hosted three Town Hall meetings where I shared with you concerns about the increased competition for students resulting from the decline in the number of high school graduates in the northeast United States and of private high school graduates nationwide. We talked about how, in order to succeed in this new environment, we need to find ways to strengthen both our academic excellence and our financial sustainability.
Since then, each University academic unit (department, or non-departmentalized school) has undertaken a self-study, and these self-studies have been reviewed by the Deans’ Council. Based on this work, and on meetings and consultations with the Senate Budget and Planning Committee, the Senate Academic Policy Committee, the Senate Committee on Faculty Economic Welfare and several student groups, we have developed a formal Proposal for Academic Renewal, which I submitted to the Senate yesterday.
The specific objectives of the Proposal are to enhance the University’s research reputation, support sustainable teaching excellence and enable significant revenue improvements. It includes the following initiatives:
The Academic Renewal project will adjust teaching loads, without exceeding the norms enshrined in our Faculty Handbook. This will allow more students to have more of their courses taught by faculty who are leaders in their fields of research and scholarship, and will reduce teaching costs and hence strengthen financial sustainability. The rebalanced teaching loads will result in fewer faculty in certain academic units, which will be addressed through voluntary incentives and, depending on the number of voluntary departures, potentially also a reduction of faculty through non-renewal of contracts and elimination of tenured positions.
Our intention is to ensure that no programs, courses or sections will be cut as a result of the Academic Renewal project, so that the quality of the student experience is maintained and strengthened. With the assistance of the consulting firm of Kennedy and Company, we determined the minimum number of faculty necessary for each department or non-departmentalized school to staff its current course offerings. The difference between that number and the current faculty count gave us the estimated faculty reduction required, approximately 35 fewer than our current staffing. The Proposal calls for the elimination of those positions after the Spring 2018 semester.
Of this number, approximately 25 are faculty who have indicated an intention to leave voluntarily, the majority by taking the current Early/Voluntary Retirement Incentive Program. The remaining ten or so would be faculty whose contracts are not renewed or whose tenured positions are eliminated. The current estimate is that four of these would come from the School of Architecture and Planning, three from the School of Music and three from the School of Arts and Sciences (two from the Department of Modern Languages and Literatures and one from the Department of Media and Communications Studies).
I share these numbers with you in the spirit of transparency, but at the same time I want to emphasize that they are still only preliminary. Indeed, the final count will not be known until the end of April, when all signed agreements for voluntary retirement have been submitted. It is possible, indeed highly desirable that, through voluntary withdrawals and other efforts, no involuntary reductions of faculty will be necessary.
Senate deliberation on the Proposal for Academic Renewal will begin next week, at its March 15 meeting. The Senate, through its designated committees, is expected to consult widely with faculty, students and administrators prior to its final vote, anticipated to be held during its May 9 meeting. The Senate’s recommendation will then be forwarded to the Board of Trustees, which will vote on the Proposal during its June 5 meeting.
In order to find out how to participate in the consultation, or to obtain a copy of the full Proposal, please contact your Senate representative. A full list of representatives by school may be found here: http://academicsenate.cua.edu/membership.cfm.
While I recognize that this process is a cause of unease for some of you, I remain convinced that the Proposal sets the right direction for our University, to ensure a strong future for our students, faculty and staff. I look forward to the coming Senate review process as an exercise in vigorous shared governance oriented towards strengthening our University as a comprehensive Catholic research institution.
Andrew V. Abela, Ph.D.